Download Books For The Advanced Genius Theory: Are They Out of Their Minds or Ahead of Their Time? Free

Present Regarding Books The Advanced Genius Theory: Are They Out of Their Minds or Ahead of Their Time?

Title	:	The Advanced Genius Theory: Are They Out of Their Minds or Ahead of Their Time?
Author	:	Jason Hartley
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	Anniversary Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 288 pages
Published	:	May 18th 2010 by Scribner (first published April 28th 2010)
Categories	:	Nonfiction. Music. Psychology. Culture. Pop Culture. Science

The Advanced Genius Theory: Are They Out of Their Minds or Ahead of Their Time?

Jason Hartley

Paperback | Pages: 288 pages

Rating: 3.53 | 380 Users | 48 Reviews

Relation In Pursuance Of Books The Advanced Genius Theory: Are They Out of Their Minds or Ahead of Their Time?

Admittedly, the Advanced Theory had unpretentious beginnings; Jason Hartley and Britt Bergman invented the concept in 1990 at a Columbia, South Carolina, Pizza Hut. From those fast-food ruminations, however, grew a great hypothesis, perhaps best expressed by Chuck Klosterman, who wrote the foreword for this book; "When a genius does something that appears idiotic, it does not necessarily mean he suddenly sucks. What it might mean is that he's doing something you cannot understand, because he has Advanced beyond you." With that insight, you can take the great leap forward into this provocative and (let's admit it) extremely entertaining paperback original. Editor's recommendation.

Declare Books Concering The Advanced Genius Theory: Are They Out of Their Minds or Ahead of Their Time?

ISBN:	1439102368 (ISBN13: 9781439102367)
Edition Language:	English URL http://advancedtheory.blogspot.com

Rating Regarding Books The Advanced Genius Theory: Are They Out of Their Minds or Ahead of Their Time?

Ratings: 3.53 From 380 Users | 48 Reviews

Appraise Regarding Books The Advanced Genius Theory: Are They Out of Their Minds or Ahead of Their Time?

This is an interesting book. The author gives criteria for different types of genius, explains why some people would not be so classified, and gives many examples. The main weakeness is that most of the examples are musicians. Since music can be very subjective, the reader may not agree with many of the examples. It seems to me that the author decided on a few people who were geniuses and then decided on the criteria and more examples. It is a book that makes a person think.

Well-developed expansion on the original Klosterman concept (which I thought was an inspired theme, but unfinished and unlike a lot of similar Chuck Stuff, went nowhere all over the place)."Advanced Genius" is a quick read, and can make someone interpret artistic legends in a unique way. But it's only one level beyond overrated/underrated, and not as fun.

Despite its claims otherwise, it's hard not to see this "theory" having a veneer of irony. Still, the bit about Foo Fighters being the "Mike & The Mechanics of grunge" made me lose it for a moment, to my fellow train-car passengers' late-night-commute irritation. For some reason the book strikes me as just a tad bit dated, even though it was only published in 2010; this is probably a personal thing, however, as I was reading a lot of Klosterman around the time The Advanced Genius Theory was

This was one of the best written books I've seen in a very long time. The author has a very distinctive almost conversational tone to his writing. Controversial yes but isn't that what art is supposed to be? Anyone who loves music is going to take something away from reading it. Since finishing the book I have re-listened to some of my favorites artists that on first listen did not seem particularly interesting. I know now that was because I was expecting the same music I had enjoyed for years.

The more time that passes since I read this book, the more I start to disagree with it. I REFUSE to believe Lou Reed's "Original Wrapper" is not god awful compared to, say, "Sister Ray." I don't think he's so advanced I just do get it, it's just awful. Hahaha. The book doesn't take itself deadly serious, so there is plenty of room to disagree with the writer. The premise is, mainly, that there are certain kind of genius artists (the book focuses mainly on musicians of the 20th century, but other

This was a tough book to read as I was very interested in a theory that purported to examine why geniuses often do things which are confusing to the public at large. Unfortunately, it's one long opinion on who the most Advanced (author's capitalization) artists of recent generations are, mostly focusing on rock and roll musicians. Hartley is dismissive of critics (though he is one) and his criteria for Advancement, muddily explained early, often fails as his actual criteria for Advancing

"...those of us who believe in Advancement don't unquestioningly embrace our idols, they have to earn our respect first. And once that is earned, we don't just abandon the relationship when they do something we don't understand, we try to understand it."The theory is that when an artistic genius alienates their fan-base and is considered "past their prime," the truth may be that they are actually ahead of their time and still producing quality work. The two strongest cases given for this theory